Where a profile points, before a single application.
J. Doe has spent eleven years in medical affairs — a PhD scientist, then a medical science liaison, now leading field medical for an oncology portfolio. For eight months the applications have gone to Medical Affairs Director roles, and they have not landed. Eight months of applications is not a small experiment. The question this answers is not “how do I write this better” but “where does this history actually carry weight, and how much is open there right now”.
-
Your history
Roles, education and skills, each tied to its evidence.
Your historyHead of Field Medical, Oncology2021 – nowMedical Science Liaison2016 – 2021PhD, Pharmacology2012 – 2016Skills with their evidence14 reviewedEntered once, reviewed by youscored -
Where you fit
Scored against every role family, in your industry and beyond.
Where you fitMedical affairs StrongMarket access & pricing StrongHealth insurance: drug benefits New industry · Insurance ModerateHealthcare strategy consultingNew industry · Consulting ModerateDigital health productNew industry · Tech StretchEvery role family, ratedyou pick one -
What it asks for
What one family’s postings ask for, and where your gaps are.
What it asks for Health insurance: drug benefitsPayer value narrativeCoveredHTA submissionsCoveredClinical evidence appraisalCoveredView full report → From 31 current postingsBenefits designGapits roles -
Roles that fit
Its open roles, each scored as it is posted.
Roles that fit Health insurance: drug benefitsHead of Pharmaceutical Benefits[COMPANY] · Zurich 69Drug Benefits Specialist, Oncology[COMPANY] · Lucerne 66Health Economics Lead[COMPANY] · Winterthur 63Pricing & Reimbursement Analyst[COMPANY] · Bern 60Scored as they post
Bands are the profile scored against each family. A Stretch band is never hidden. A direction you can see and judge is worth more than one that has been quietly greyed out, and the whole point of the read is to widen what is in view. An illustration — your own version is built from your own history.
Market access & pricing was never searched for. It does not contain the words on J. Doe's last contract, so no keyword search would return it — and it scores Strong on eleven years of evidence work that a market-access team is paid to do. That is the difference between a job board and a read of the market: the board answers what you typed.
The requirements are the ones this family actually asks for; the verdicts are each one scored against J. Doe's own history. Four of six already answered. The two that are not are both about owning the commercial decision rather than building the case behind it — which is the real distance to cover, stated as a fact rather than a discouragement.
Outside pharma: health insurance, drug benefits. A family in another industry, and one J. Doe never considered. It scores Moderate because insurers' drug-benefit teams ask for evidence work already in this history — the payer value narrative and health-technology assessment — seen from the payer's side of the table.
From 31 current postings in this family; the figure beside each requirement is the share of them that ask for it. Three of the four asked most often are already in J. Doe's history. The fourth, benefits design, is the insurer's own craft, and it is the real distance to cover for this move.